Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 114(1): 17-32, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32863158

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Heart failure management guidelines have been published, but the degree of adherence to these guidelines remains unknown. AIMS: To study in 2015 healthcare utilization and causes of death for people previously identified with heart failure. METHODS: The national health data system was used to identify adult general scheme (86% of the French population) hospitalized for heart failure between 2011 and 2014 or with only a long-term chronic disease allowance for heart failure. The frequency and median (interquartile range) of at least one healthcare use among those still alive in 2015 was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 499,296 adults (1.4% of the population) were included, and 429,853 were alive in 2015; median age 79 (68-86) years. At least one utilization was observed for a general practitioner in 95% of patients (median 8 [interquartile range 5-13] consultations), a cardiologist in 42% (2 [1-3]), a nurse in 78% (16 [4-100]), a loop diuretic in 64% (11 [8-12] dispensations), an aldosterone antagonist in 21% (8 [5-11]), a thiazide in 15% (7 [4-11]), a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor in 68% (11 [8-13]), a beta-blocker in 65% (11 [7-13]), a beta-blocker plus a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor in 57%, and a beta-blocker plus a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor plus an aldosterone antagonist in 37%. Hospitalization for heart failure was present for 8% (1 [1,2]). Higher levels of healthcare utilization were observed in the presence of hospitalization for heart failure before 2015. Among the 13.9% of people who died in 2015, heart failure accounted for 8% of causes, cardiovascular disease accounted for 39%. CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners and nurses are the main actors in the regular follow-up of patients with heart failure, whereas cardiologist consultations and dispensing of first-line treatments are insufficient with respect to guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Evaluación de Necesidades , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Cardiólogos , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/normas , Estudios Transversales , Bases de Datos Factuales , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normas , Femenino , Francia , Médicos Generales , Adhesión a Directriz , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/normas , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Necesidades/normas , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Derivación y Consulta , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
2.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 109(6-7): 376-83, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27020513

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Whereas the coronary artery disease death rate has declined in high-income countries, the incidence of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is increasing in sub-Saharan Africa, where their management remains a challenge. AIM: To propose a consensus statement to optimize management of ACS in sub-Saharan Africa on the basis of realistic considerations. METHODS: The AFRICARDIO-2 conference (Yamoussoukro, May 2015) reviewed the ongoing features of ACS in 10 sub-Saharan countries (Benin, Burkina-Faso, Congo-Brazzaville, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Senegal, Togo), and analysed whether improvements in strategies and policies may be expected using readily available healthcare facilities. RESULTS: The outcome of patients with ACS is affected by clearly identified factors, including: delay to reaching first medical contact, achieving effective hospital transportation, increased time from symptom onset to reperfusion therapy, limited primary emergency facilities (especially in rural areas) and emergency medical service (EMS) prehospital management, and hence limited numbers of patients eligible for myocardial reperfusion (thrombolytic therapy and/or percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]). With only five catheterization laboratories in the 10 participating countries, PCI rates are very low. However, in recent years, catheterization laboratories have been built in referral cardiology departments in large African towns (Abidjan and Dakar). Improvements in patient care and outcomes should target limited but selected objectives: increasing awareness and recognition of ACS symptoms; education of rural-based healthcare professionals; and developing and managing a network between first-line healthcare facilities in rural areas or small cities, emergency rooms in larger towns, the EMS, hospital-based cardiology departments and catheterization laboratories. CONCLUSION: Faced with the increasing prevalence of ACS in sub-Saharan Africa, healthcare policies should be developed to overcome the multiple shortcomings blunting optimal management. European and/or North American management guidelines should be adapted to African specificities. Our consensus statement aims to optimize patient management on the basis of realistic considerations, given the healthcare facilities, organizations and few cardiology teams that are available.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Países en Desarrollo , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Terapia Trombolítica , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/mortalidad , África del Sur del Sahara/epidemiología , Cateterismo Cardíaco/normas , Consenso , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Incidencia , Evaluación de Necesidades/organización & administración , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/normas , Prevalencia , Terapia Trombolítica/normas , Tiempo de Tratamiento/organización & administración , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 108(11): 576-88, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26433733

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few studies have analyzed the cost of treatment of chronic angina pectoris, especially in European countries. AIM: To determine, using a modeling approach, the cost of care in 2012 for 1year of treatment of patients with stable angina, according to four therapeutic options: optimal medical therapy (OMT); percutaneous coronary intervention with bare-metal stent (PCI-BMS); PCI with drug-eluting stent (PCI-DES); and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). METHODS: Six different clinical scenarios that could occur over 1year were defined: clinical success; recurrence of symptoms without hospitalization; myocardial infarction (MI); subsequent revascularization; death from non-cardiac cause; and cardiac death. The probability of a patient being in one of the six clinical scenarios, according to the therapeutic options used, was determined from a literature search. A direct medical cost for each of the therapeutic options was calculated from the perspective of French statutory health insurance. RESULTS: The annual costs per patient for each strategy, according to their efficacy results, were, in our models, €1567 with OMT, €5908 with PCI-BMS, €6623 with PCI-DES and €16,612 with CABG. These costs were significantly different (P<0.05). A part of these costs was related to management of complications (recurrence of symptoms, MI and death) during the year (between 3% and 38% depending on the therapeutic options studied); this part of the expenditure was lowest with the CABG therapeutic option. CONCLUSION: OMT appears to be the least costly option, and, if reasonable from a clinical point of view, might achieve appreciable savings in health expenditure.


Asunto(s)
Angina Estable/economía , Angina Estable/terapia , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/economía , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/economía , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/economía , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Gastos en Salud , Modelos Económicos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/economía , Anciano , Angina Estable/diagnóstico , Angina Estable/mortalidad , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Causas de Muerte , Enfermedad Crónica , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de los Medicamentos , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/economía , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Metales/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Diseño de Prótesis , Recurrencia , Stents/economía , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 107(3): 158-68, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24662470

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: National population-based management and outcome data for patients of all ages hospitalized for heart failure have rarely been reported. AIM: National population-based management and outcome of patients of all ages hospitalized for heart failure have rarely been reported. The present study reports these results, based on 77% of the French population, for patients hospitalized for the first time for heart failure in 2009. METHODS: The study population comprised French national health insurance general scheme beneficiaries hospitalized in 2009 with a principal diagnosis of heart failure, after exclusion of those hospitalized for heart failure between 2006 and 2008 or with a chronic disease status for heart failure. Data were collected from the national health insurance information system (SNIIRAM). RESULTS: A total of 69,958 patients (mean age, 78 years; 48% men) were studied. The hospital mortality rate was 6.4%, with 1-month, 1-year and 2-year survival rates of 89%, 71% and 60%, respectively. Heart failure and all-cause readmission-free rates were 55% and 43% at 1 year and 27% and 17% at 2 years, respectively. Compared with a reference sample of 600,000 subjects, the age- and sex-standardized relative risk of death was 29 (95% confidence interval [CI] 28-29) at 2 years, 82 (95% CI 72-94) in subjects aged<50 years and 3 (95% CI 3-3) in subjects aged ≥ 90 years. For subjects aged < 70 years who survived 1 month after discharge, factors associated with a reduction in the 2-year mortality rate were: female sex; age < 55 years; absence of co-morbidities; and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers, lipid-lowering agents or oral anticoagulants during the month following discharge. Poor prognostic factors were treatment with a loop diuretic before or after hospitalization and readmission for heart failure within 1 month after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: This large population-based study confirms the severe prognosis of heart failure and the need to promote the use of effective medications and management designed to improve survival.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Hospitalización , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cardiología , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Causas de Muerte , Comorbilidad , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Pronóstico , Derivación y Consulta , Factores de Riesgo , Inhibidores del Simportador de Cloruro Sódico y Cloruro Potásico/uso terapéutico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 106(12): 680-9, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24239052

RESUMEN

Cardiovascular mortality has decreased over the past 25 years, largely because of acute coronary syndrome care and preventive actions. Nevertheless, the rate of coronary heart disease remains high, with an annual risk of 4.7% (cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke). Cardiovascular risk factor management must be a priority in primary and secondary prevention, to improve the prognosis of this severe disease, in which absence of symptoms does not mean benignity. The current goals of therapeutic patient education are smoking cessation, regular physical activity, a cardioprotective (Mediterranean) diet, management of stress, good treatment adherence (which improves compliance), judicious use of the care system and help with occupational reintegration. Current and future programmes must be in accordance with the Haute Autorité de Santé recommendations published in 2007.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Coronaria/prevención & control , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/normas , Prevención Primaria/educación , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Prevención Secundaria/educación , Enfermedad Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Coronaria/epidemiología , Enfermedad Coronaria/fisiopatología , Dieta Mediterránea , Humanos , Actividad Motora , Programas Nacionales de Salud/normas , Cooperación del Paciente , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Estrés Psicológico/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA